Skip to main content

Amber Heard's attempt to get a judge to end Johnny Depp's libel suit has been dismissed

On Tuesday, a Virginia state judge ruled that Johnny Depp's two-year libel lawsuit against his ex-wife, Amber Heard, would not be dismissed, securing the case next year.

Hurd's decision to close the case - his third step since Depp filed a lawsuit in March 2019 - was dismissed by Fairfax County Chief Justice Penny Askarate for a number of reasons detailed in a decision taken by USA TODAY.

Hurd tried to dismiss the suit in Virginia, citing a London judge's ruling last year in a libel lawsuit brought by Depp against the publisher of The Sun, which he lost after a controversial legal battle in an English courtroom.

A London judge concluded that the 2018 article which called Depp a 'wife killer' was not defamatory and that the 'vast majority' of Hurd's domestic violence charges 'can be proven to civil standards' .

https://deadline.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Johnny-Depp-Amber-Heard-1.jpg
But because the two cases were not the same - Hurd was not involved in the London trial, although she was a witness to The Sun - Judge Virginia Askarate ruled that her argument for the dismissal was not did not meet established legal standards governing civil cases. can be made redundant.

In his ruling, Azkarat said: “The Respondent's assertion that refusing to recognize the UK's decision in this case would set a dangerous precedent is incorrect. “On the other hand, supporting English libel judgments in the United States would be a deterrent and set a dangerous precedent. Therefore, this Court is not persuaded by the arguments of the defendant. "

The move was a big triumph for the actor in his ongoing battle with his ex, which began during their divorce in California in 2016 and has now survived their troubled marriage.

Depp's attorney, Benjamin Chu of Brown Rudnick in Washington DC, said: “Mr. Depp is extremely pleased with the court's decision.

USA TODAY contacted Elaine Charlson Bredehoft, attorney for Heard in Virginia.

The trial is scheduled to take place in Fairfax County, Virginia's largest and most populous county in suburban Washington, DC, on April 11, 2022. Both parties, including Hurd, will reopen the proceedings, as taking statements.

Virginia's actions stem from an article Hurd wrote in December 2018 for the Washington Post (published in Virginia) in which she claimed to be the public face of domestic violence. In her post, she lamented that she "felt the full weight of our culture's anger against women speaking out."

Depp filed a lawsuit several months later, claiming $ 50 million in damages. According to his trial, he presented himself as the victim of "false" accusations, "part of an elaborate ploy to create positive publicity" for Heard to improve his career.

The lawsuit alleges that “Ms. Hurd was not a victim of domestic violence; she is a criminal. "

According to Depp's lawsuit, Hurd never named the Pirates of the Caribbean star by name in his article, but it was clear who and what she meant.

His article came after the couple's tumultuous divorce proceedings in 2016, in which Hurd accused Depp of domestic violence, sought a restraining order against him and claimed he threw a cell phone in her face during the 'a fight in their loft in downtown Los Angeles. ...

Depp vehemently denied all charges, and Los Angeles police officers who arrived in their attic on the night of the alleged violence said they found no evidence of the crime.

At the end of the summer, they came to an amicable agreement and issued a long joint statement in which they confessed their love.

"Our relationship was incredibly passionate and at times tumultuous, but always bound by love," the statement said. “For reasons of financial gain, neither party made any false statements. There was never any intention to hurt anyone physically or emotionally. Amber wishes Johnny all the best for the future. Amber plans to donate the proceeds of the divorce to charity. "

Several groups of Heard lawyers have tried unsuccessfully to dismiss Depp's trial in Virginia over the past two years. Meanwhile, in Depp's defamation lawsuit in London, which ended in June 2020 after a three-week circus-style lawsuit, two movie stars acted as star witnesses.

As a result of the incident, Depp was replaced by dark wizard Gellert Grindelwald in the Fantastic Beasts franchise with Mads Mikkelsen.

Depp told the Sunday Times in London this week that he was boycotted by Hollywood, mentioned the "surreal five years" associated with the affair and discussed the impact of the film industry on his once promising career.

Meanwhile, Heard has since become a single mother, posting on Instagram earlier this year that she secretly welcomed a daughter, Una Paige Heard, on her "own terms."

New York judge granted motion to investigate whether Heard turned over his full $ 7 million divorce settlement to the American Civil Liberties Union and Los Angeles Children's Hospital , as she had promised.

As a result of that order last month, the ACLU is now required to provide documents to prove whether Heard fulfilled his pledge to donate, which was the subject of controversy in the Virginia case.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Taliban's medieval justice: The corpses of three 'criminals' are hoisted from diggers in Herat after they 'invaded another man's home and tried to rob him' in Afghanistan

The bodies of three alleged criminals were hung from diggers in Afghanistan by the Taliban, harrowing pictures released today show. According to deputy governor Mawlawi Shir Ahmad Muhajir, the three men were killed by another man when they entered his home in Obe district in Herat province. In the graphic images shared on social media, the corpses are shown publicly hoisted into the air and hanging by their necks from the raised arms of two diggers as people below watch on and take photographs. Tuesday's gruesome publicly display is yet another example of the kind of practices that feed international concern that the Taliban have returned to their brutal ways last seen when they were in control of Afghanistan from 1996 to 2001. This is despite the Taliban frequently insisting to the world that it has changed from the hard-line Islamic group that doled out brutal punishments to criminals and greatly restricted the rights of the country's citizens, particularly women and girls. P...

Gambino family underboss dies in prison from 'health issues' at the age of 89: Daughter 'rushed to be by her father's side and he sang Frank Sinatra as he took his last breath'

Frank LoCascio, the Dapper Don's former underboss and acting consigliere, passed away Friday after serving 31 years of a life sentence A Gambino crime family underboss who stayed loyal to John Gotti even as the pair were hit with life sentences during a 1992 murder and racketeering trial has died in prison at age 89. Frank LoCascio, the Dapper Don's former underboss and acting consigliere, passed away Friday at the Federal Medical Center, Devens - a facility that houses federal prisoners with health issues - in Massachusetts. His daughter, Lisa LoCascio, was by his side as he took his last breaths.  LoCascio had been incarcerated for 31 years before his death last week after famously refusing to snitch on notorious mob boss Gotti during their infamous and highly publicized trial.  What's more, the high-ranking mafioso managed to cheat death during his three decades in the pen even with Gotti as his enemy, after the Teflon Don turned on him and put a 'contract' on hi...

The Texas abortion ban sends mixed signals about the future of Roe v. Wade.

Legal experts say it is still unclear how the Supreme Court will rule on long-standing abortion guarantees, which it plans to review later this year. Despite uproar from activist organizations that see the move as a de facto departure from the 1973 ruling, the Supreme Court's failure to act on Texas's near-total abortion ban does not necessarily mean Roe v. Wade is dead. Legal experts say it is unclear how the Supreme Court will rule on long-standing guarantees for abortion, which it plans to review later this year when it hears a direct appeal against this important ruling. Texas' first-of-its-kind law allows individuals, not the government, to impose a six-week ban on abortion and file lawsuits against health professionals or anyone who helps someone get an abortion. Clinics and other potential claimants will find it more difficult to establish their position in court or to determine a specific target for satisfying claims due to the unusual enforcement mechanism. Judges...